Kent v. Coleman Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of nonsuit taken by plaintiff after a demurrer of each of the two defendants had been sustained to the three counts of the complaint, as amended.
The judgment entry shows that the plaintiff filed his complaint, consisting of Counts 1 and 2, against the defendant, The Coleman Company, and defendants Patterson, husband and wife. The Coleman Company and the Pattersons filed separate demurrers and they were sustained. Count A was added to the complaint, and was amended. The separate demurrers of the defendants to the complaint, as amended, were sustained. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Autry v. Roebuck Park Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Turner v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Mullins v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Dunlavy v. DunlavySupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Standifer v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. GatlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Rezner v. Fairhope Single Tax CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- WALTER L. COUSE & COMPANY v. Hardy CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. GatlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.