Legal Opinion

Gilfillan v. Dewoody

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1893No. Appeal, No. 75PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 75, Oct. T., 1893, by use plaintiff, Perry Dewoody, from order of C. P. Yenango Co., Jan. T., 1890, No. 12, in C. W. Gilfillan, Trustee of Lamberton Savings Bank, v. A. W. Dewoody and A. L. Dewoody, subrogating A. W. Dewoody to the rights of plaintiff. Rule for subrogation.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 75, Oct. T., 1893, by use plaintiff, Perry Dewoody, from order of C. P. Yenango Co., Jan. T., 1890, No. 12, in C. W. Gilfillan, Trustee of Lamberton Savings Bank, v. A. W. Dewoody and A. L. Dewoody, subrogating A. W. Dewoody to the rights of plaintiff. Rule for subrogation. From the record it appeared that, on Jan. 29, 1890, A. W. Dewoody and A. L. Dewoody confessed judgment in favor of C. W. Gilfillan, trustee of Lamberton Savings Bank, for $393.75. Subsequently A. L. Dewoody confessed judgments in favor of Perry Dewoody for sums aggregating more than $1,110. Perry Dewoody issued…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

An examination of the record in this case has failed to satisfy us that there is any error in the decree of which appellant complains.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, with costs to be paid by appellant.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sopherstein v. BertelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API