Legal Opinion

In re Bank of Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Tbe appellant, R. L. Anderson, sets forth as follows tbe question involved: “Tbe only question involved in tbis appeal is whether the court committed an error in sustaining tbe demurrer ore terms of Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks to tbe grounds set out by R. L. Anderson, appellant, on bis appeal from a stock assessment on stock alleged to be owned by him in tbe Bank of Murphy.” We think tbe demurrer should have been overruled.

We have read tbe record thoroughly and think the demurrer should have been overruled. The complaint is not demurrable unless wholly insufficient. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Morris BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Andrews Ex Rel. Andrews v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Ellis v. . PerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Stepp v. . SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API