Colorado Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

(concurring) .

I concur in the opinion of the court, except its implication that there is only one reason for dismissing the appeal.

The Sanders case determines that one likely to be financially injured by the issue of a license has standing to appeal and “to raise * * * any relevant question of law in respect of the order of the Commission,” i. e., “to bring to the attention of the appellate court errors of *28law in the action of the Commission in granting the license.”1 I think that the present appeal raises no relevant question of law.

The Sanders case permits an appellant to come here, but not…