Legal Opinion

Charles E. Hires Co. v. Stromeyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1916No. Appeal, No. 72PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 72, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co., Aug. T., 1915, No. 91, for defendant n. o. v. in case of Charles E. Hires Company v. Julius Stromeyer, trading as J. Stromeyer & Company. Assumpsit for breach of contract to sell and deliver sugar.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 72, Oct. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co., Aug. T., 1915, No. 91, for defendant n. o. v. in case of Charles E. Hires Company v. Julius Stromeyer, trading as J. Stromeyer & Company. Assumpsit for breach of contract to sell and deliver sugar. The statement averred that the sugar delivered was not according to the contract was rejected and that plaintiff suffered loss by reason of being obliged to purchase other sugar in the market at an advanced price. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The case was tried by the court…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trenler, J.,

The plaintiff purchased of the defendant five hundred bags of sugar to be delivered clean and merchantable in lined, jute sacks. The sugar was furnished in unlined sacks and was found to be unclean and unfit for plaintiff’s use. The sugar was returned to defendant by the plaintiff who went into the open market and bought the nearest substitute paying a higher price than was stipulated in the contract. It now brings suit for its damages. The case was tried before a judge in the Municipal Court without a jury and resulted in finding for the plaintiff which the court, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. F. B. Fogel & Co. v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Spiegelberg v. KarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Elzea v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Philadelphia Whiting Co. v. Detroit White Lead WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Baltimore Brick Co. v. CoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wiloil Corp. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Pittsburgh Provision & Packing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Commonwealth v. Wiloil Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Everedy MacHine Co. v. Hazle Maid BakersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Gilbert v. AyoobSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API