Legal Opinion

People v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports County Court’s determination that defendant was not an “incapacitated person” (CPL 730.10 [1]). The testimony at defendant’s CPL article 730 hearing established that, although defendant is mentally retarded, his level of intellectual functioning is not so deficient as to render him incompetent to stand trial (see, People v Miranda, 125 AD2d 418).

Defendant’s plea allocution reveals a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal that encompasses the contention that defendant’s sentence is harsh and excessive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. MirandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. AustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API