Legal Opinion

De Vincentis Et Ux. v. Holden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1932No. Appeal, 139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the court below opening a judgment, so far as concerns two of the judgment debtors. The order must be reversed.

Plaintiff was the owner of a plot of land, subject to a duly recorded blanket mortgage, dated May 7, 1926, and payable five years thereafter. It stated that specified tracts would be released on the payment of specified sums. On March 28, 1929, plaintiff entered into a written agreement with Harry E. Holden, Philip Sklar and George R. Holden to sell to them one of these tracts for $42,000, the agreement stating that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wiggins' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown, for Use v. Castle Shannon Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Reliance Insurance Companies v. FestaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Kweller v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Farmers Trust Co. v. Egulf, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API