Ahr v. Ahr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The parties hereto were divorced by interlocutory decree March 19, 1955. The complaint for partition of real property was filed January, 1956, by Edward Ahr and an interlocutory judgment of partition was entered August 17, 1956. Prior to the divorce, the parties occupied the premises and pending the divorce trial the property was conveyed to the parties by Marie G. Nimmo, record owner of the property. It is a part of Lots 29 and 30, Block 8, Tract 4515, and also easement over Lot 29.
Respondent contends that ever since the separation, March 1954, appellant had sole and exclusive possession of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Wilson v. MatteiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Hughes v. DevlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- De Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. TessmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014