Marvel Worldwide, Inc. v. Kirby
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
MeMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Marvel Worldwide, Inc., Marvel Characters, Inc., and MVL Rights, LLC (collectively “Marvel”) commenced this action seeking declaratory relief as to the work-for-hire status of the comic-book stories and characters created by Jack Kirby. In response, Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Lisa R. Kirby, Barbara J. Kirby, Neal L. Kirby, and Susan M. Kirby (collectively, the “Kirbys”) counterclaimed for declaratory relief and joined additional Counterclaim-Defendants…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marvel Characters, Inc. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. v. Vilmorin & CieDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Grayson v. Ressler & ResslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- City of Syracuse v. Loomis Armored US, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.