Legal Opinion

Casey v. . N.Y. Cent. and H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We agree with the opinion of the General Term that the motion made by the defendant for a nonsuit was properly denied. There was evidence showing that no bell was rung or whistle blown upon the engine which caused the death of the deceased; that no flagman was at or near the place where the accident occurred, as had previously been the case; and that the engine, with tender ahead and three cars behind, rushed backwards towards the deceased, from a place where it could not well be seen, at a rate of speed from ten to twelve miles an hour. There is also proof that neither the fireman in charge…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waldele v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. L. R., M. R. & T. Ry. Co. v. LeverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  3. Waldele v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Stever v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Curtis v. Hudson Valley Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API