Murphy v. Busick
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
— Appellants instituted proceedings supplementary to execution, under sections 828-831 Burns 1894, sections 816-819 Horner 1897, against appellee Allen G. Bu-sick and his codefendants and appellees, Oliver H. Bogue, James I. Robertson, and Kate M. Busick, executors of the last will of Joseph Busick, late of "Wabash county, Indiana, deceased. The court sustained the demurrer of the executors, and appellants refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against them. The only error assigned is the sustaining of the demurrer.
The complaint alleges that appellants are the owners of a judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hallett v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Waring v. MasonNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Rand v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Ross v. ClussmanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850
- Fleece v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dennis Garner v. Gregory S. Kempf and Clerk of Vanderburgh County (garnishee)Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Silver Bow Abstract Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Bogue v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Dennis Garner v. Gregory S. Kempf and Clerk of Vanderburgh County (garnishee)Indiana Supreme Court · 2018