Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elick v. Champlin Petroleum Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1985No. C14-83-777CVPublished

1DissentSears, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The only persons with authority to execute mineral leases are the owners of the minerals. Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Tex. 450, 86 S.W.2d 1077, 1079 (1935). Appellants had no ownership interest in the mineral estate, therefore they could have no right to execute the leases thereon. “Only owners of mineral interests have authority to execute such leases.” Grissom v. Guetersloh, 391 S.W.2d 167, 171 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1965, writ ref’d n.r.e.).

The history of Texas oil and gas law is that the executive right is a “power coupled with an interest.” A power…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Dallapi v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API