Legal Opinion

Concerned Irrigators v. Belle Fourche Irrigation District

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 2, 2001No. 99-1895, 99-1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the Belle Fourche Irrigation District’s method of assessing construction debt and operation and maintenance (0 & M) costs to the landowners in the District. Concerned Irrigators, a landowners’ association, and Harold Nelson and Laurie Barnaud, individual landowners, appeal the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to the District. The appellants (collectively, Concerned Irriga-tors) argue that the District is violating both federal law, which requires construction charges to be equitably apportioned, and state law, which requires…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. South Delta Water Agency v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Flint v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Concerned Irrigators Harold Nelson Laurie Barnaud v. Belle Fourche Irrigation District Gary Brunner Darrell Cox Steve Gatzke Harlan Palo Arthur Persche Robert Ruff Walter Stumpf, Individually and in Their Official Capacity as the Board of Directors of the Belle Fourche Irrigation District, - Concerned Irrigators Harold Nelson Laurie Barnaud v. Belle Fourche Irrigation District Gary Brunner Darrell Cox Steve Gatzke Harlan Palo Arthur Persche Robert Ruff Walter Stumpf, Individually and in Their Official Capacity as the Board of Directors of the Belle Fourche Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API