Legal Opinion
Radesky v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1974No. Civ. 42064PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT
In an amended petition for a writ of mandate Donald A.
Radesky (hereafter Radesky), a police officer for respondent City of Los Angeles (hereafter the City), sought to compel the payment to him of temporary disability compensation pursuant to section 4.177 of the Los Angeles City Administrative Code. The City interposed a demurrer to Radesky’s amended petition, which was sustained without leave to amend. An order of dismissal was entered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 581, subdivision 3.
Radesky appeals from “the order of the above entitled Superior Court entered in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joffe v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cnty. of San Diego v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- NoneUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- Clarence William Speer & Susan M. Speer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- County of San Diego v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.