Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Smith v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1991No. A90A1633; A90A1853Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge

As I understand it, the point of our holding is that UMC Allstate is entitled to summary judgment not because the statute of limitation applying to contracts ran against its insureds’ causes of action, but because Allstate was not served with the statutory notice of the tort suit within the statute of limitation for the tort suit against other parties. The statutory notice is a prerequisite for the later filing of a contract action against the UMC based on the happening of one of the circumstances described in OCGA § 33-7-11 (b) (1) (D).

A UMC decision to enter, as a party, the suit brought as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bohannon v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Patrick v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Yarbrough v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Harris v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API