Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Powers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1931No. Docket No. 43, Calendar No. 35,666PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill herein was filed to foreclose a real estate mortgage executed by Charles and Hester Powers, husband and wife, owners by entirety. After suit Mr. Powers died, and defendant Tisdale is the representative of his estate. Defendants, by cross-bill, alleged duress, want of consideration, and failure of the mortgage to show compliance with the provisions of Act No. 158, Pub. Acts 1917, and prayed discharge thereof. Plaintiff appeals from a decree discharging the mortgage.

Two sons of Charles Powers, and stepsons of Hester Powers, had been arrested upon a capias ad respondendum for an alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kies v. WalworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hanson v. LoescherMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dickman v. EndertMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Federal Bond & Mortgage Co. v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fors v. ThomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Benjamin v. BondyMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Atwood v. SchleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Payne v. CavanaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API