Legal Opinion
Eggers v. Mitchem
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided August 5, 1949No. 47481PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHays, C. J.
— This is -an action to recover the expense of attorney fees incurred in a suit brought by an adjoining landowner to establish a boundary line by acquiescence, under chapter 650, Code of 1946. In that action tbe petition was dismissed by the trial court and affirmed on appeal. Eggers v. Mitchem, 239 Iowa 1211, 34 N. W. 2d 603. This suit is based upon an alleged breach of covenants of warranty of title and the defend ants are predecessors of title. The • trial court dismissed the petition of cross-petitioners and they appeal.
-.Appellants took title to the real’estate in question in 1945 from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McNair v. SockriterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Eggers v. MitchemSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Eversole v. EarlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Frankel v. BlankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Kendall v. LowtherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Duck Creek Tire Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, and Midwest Mexican Connection, LTD., an Iowa Corporation v. Goodyear Corners, L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- First Fiduciary Corp. v. BlancoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- McDonald v. Delhi Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.