Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goodrow v. Perrin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1979No. 78-088Published

1DissentDouglas, J.

I believe that this case presents serious equal protection and due process problems under N.H. CONST, pt. I, arts. 1, 15. RSA 632-A:3 does not require knowledge of the victim’s minority. This makes it unique under the Criminal Code. There is no rational basis upon which to distinguish this crime from other similar crimes.

For example, RSA 639:1 provides that a person is guilty of the crime of bigamy if, “having a spouse and knowing that he is not legally eligible to marry, he marries another.” (Emphasis added.) Under RSA 639:2, a person is guilty of incest if he “marries or has sexual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GuestAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. State v. GoonanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  4. State v. AkersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API