Legal Opinion

In re Kronenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney by this court on October 20,1971, under the name Robert Marvin Kronenberg. *265In this proceeding the Special Referee sustained a single charge of misconduct against the respondent alleging that he was convicted upon his plea of guilty on October 15, 1985, of a serious crime, to wit, employing a person, not an attorney, to solicit legal business in violation of Judiciary Law §482, an unclassified misdemeanor (Judiciary Law § 485). The respondent had entered into an arrangement with a civilian employee of the New York City…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re EhrlichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. HankinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. People v. HankinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API