Legal Opinion

State v. Sterling

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1889No. 1,326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Fourteenth District Court, Parish of Calcasieu. Heed, J. Ox Motion to Quash. The acts of the cleric as a jury commissioner, not having qualified as such, are null and void, and vitiates all proceedings in which he participated as jury commissioner.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Fourteenth District Court, Parish of Calcasieu. Heed, J. Ox Motion to Quash. The acts of the cleric as a jury commissioner, not having qualified as such, are null and void, and vitiates all proceedings in which he participated as jury commissioner. Act No. 44 • of 1S77, Sec. 3, p. 56, approved hi arch 8th, 1877 ; State vs. Williams, 30 Ann. 1028; State vs. Vance, 31 Ann. 398; State vs. Bradley, 32 Ann. 402. The evidence of the clerk is admissible to show that he did not qualify as jury commissioner. On Motion for a New Trial. Hearsay testimony is inadmissible. Tlio best…

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of tlio Court was delivered by

Fenner, J.

A preliminary question arises in tliis case under a motion _ to quash tlie indictment, on tlie ground that tlie clerk of the court, who served as a member of tlie jury commission which drew tlie panel from which tlie grand jury finding this indictment, was selected, had not qualified as jury commissioner.

Such a defect, urged seasonably and properly, is fatal to tlie indictment and to all othor proceedings of the jury drawn by such an imperfect commission. State vs. Williams, 30 Ann. 1028; State vs. Revels, 31 Ann. 387; State vs. Vance, 31…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Vincent v. Teche Transfer Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API