Hargadine-Mckittrick Dry-Goods Co. v. Swofford Brothers Dry-goods Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from court of appeals, northern department; John H. Mahan, Abijah Wells, and Samuel W. McElkoy, judges.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dosteb., O.J.:
A. R. Kramer was a merchant doing business at Galena, Kan., under the name of A. R. Kramer & Co. He owed the Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company, a corporation, nearly $15,-000, and on March 2,1896, executed to it an instrument more nearly in the nature of a conditional bill of sale of his stock of goods than anything else. Without containing words of sale and transfer, it declared that the stock of goods “is the sole property of said Hargadine-McKittrick Dry-goods Company, and to remain so until the following indebtedness is paid,”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Dunning v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Ellis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Whitmore v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Clay v. WoodrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fish v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Assets Realization Co. v. CardonUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Bottom v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Dickson v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Union City Realty & Trust Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.