Legal Opinion
Rosen v. County of Suffolk
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 16, 2002No. Docket No. 02-7033PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED in part, and VACATED and REMANDED in part.
Plaintiff-appellant Samuel D. Rosen appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Thomas C. Platt, Judge), entered on March 29, 2002, granting defendant-appellee Susan A. Hanrahan’s motion to dismiss Rosen’s § 1983 and state law claims. The complaint alleges that Hanrahan violated Rosen’s constitutional rights and committed state law torts when she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Kirschner v. KlemonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Spear v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosen v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Rosen v. County of Suffolk, NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Brandt v. SSADistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Kelly v. Officer MurphyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Lindke v. LaneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023