Legal Opinion

Wheeldin v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1960No. 16219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants (plaintiffs below) were subpoenaed to appear before a committee of the United States House of Representatives proposing to conduct a hearing in Los Angeles. Thereupon, as plaintiffs they filed a complaint against William Wheeler (a committee investigator) and against Robert W. Ware (the United States marshal) and Eugene Biscailuz (sheriff of Los Angeles County, California) together with the sureties of the last two named. The sheriff and marshal, through their deputies, had served the subpoenas.

The complaint sought injunctive relief, a declaratory judgment as to validity of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. R. W. Agnew v. City of Compton, a Municipal Corporation H. R. Lindemulder and Frank SpragueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Martin Jimenez v. Bruce Barber, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the Thirteenth Immigration DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. John v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Henry C. Hicks v. City of Los Angeles, a Corporation Board of Civil Service Commissioners, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donald Wheeldin and Admiral Dawson v. William WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Wheeldin v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API