In re Lee
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83, 87 (83 SCt 1194, 10 LE2d 215) (1963), the United States Supreme Court held that “the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Consistent with Brady, Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8 (d) requires a prosecuting attorney in a criminal case to “make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burgan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- In re WoodhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anglin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- In the Matter of Natalie Spires PaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- In the Matter of Demone Wyatt LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- The State v. Echols.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018