Legal Opinion

Lange v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1884No. 11,589PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The jurat to the affidavit on which the information is founded is thus signed: “ B. S. B. Stamats, Notary Public,” and is attested by the seal, containing these-words: “Notary Public. Seal. Indiana.” The contention of counsel is that the affidavit is not sufficient, because not attested by a proper notarial seal. We think the seal does indicate the official character of the officer, and that is all that the statute requires. The statute does not require that the seal shall state the name of the county in which the notary resides or for which he was appointed.

The purpose of the act of 1883…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. CunninghamMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Surber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Mimms v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Minton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API