Legal Opinion · Dissent

Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 23, 1978No. 76-1800Published

1DissentBazelon, Circuit Judge

I respectfully submit that the court today departs from well-established principles in this circuit in order to sustain summary judgment for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The court also adopts a restrictive definition of “agency records” that erodes the right to disclosure under the *357Freedom of Information Act1 (FOIA) and promotes secret law.

I. THE NEED FOR DISCOVERY IN FOIA CASES

Without discovery, a party to litigation may not have access to facts necessary to oppose" a motion for summary judgment. This problem is especially acute for plaintiffs in FOIA cases. Indeed, recognition of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API