Legal Opinion

Hoyer v. Cannedy

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 28, 1979No. 50,261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

Plaintiff, an adult daughter of defendants, brought this action seeking recovery of money alleged to be due and owing for services rendered to and for her parents during a 52 week period when defendant Laura Cannedy was wholly or partially incapacitated while recuperating from an accident-caused back injury. Upon trial to the court, plaintiff was granted judgment. Defendants appeal.

The trial court’s oral decision may be interpreted as finding for plaintiff on a theory of a contract implied in fact, a contract implied in law, or quantum meruit. The journal entry recites “doctrine of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Fox v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Baldwin v. HambletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. In Re Estate of RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Nelson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lostutter v. Estate of LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. In Re Estate of KreieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Schulte v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API