Hoyer v. Cannedy
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rees, J.:
Plaintiff, an adult daughter of defendants, brought this action seeking recovery of money alleged to be due and owing for services rendered to and for her parents during a 52 week period when defendant Laura Cannedy was wholly or partially incapacitated while recuperating from an accident-caused back injury. Upon trial to the court, plaintiff was granted judgment. Defendants appeal.
The trial court’s oral decision may be interpreted as finding for plaintiff on a theory of a contract implied in fact, a contract implied in law, or quantum meruit. The journal entry recites “doctrine of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Fox v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Baldwin v. HambletonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- In Re Estate of RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Nelson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lostutter v. Estate of LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- In Re Estate of KreieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Schulte v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981