Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dumas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1928No. 11869PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order of the court refusing bail on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus.

There was no evidence introduced to show that the appellant committed any offense. The indictment is not evidence that the offense was committed but is merely evidence that the accused is charged with an offense. In Art. 1, Sec. 11, of the Constitution of Texas, it is declared:

"All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offenses, when the proof is evident; but this provision shall not be so construed as to prevent bail after indictment found upon examination of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TownsleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Ex Parte StephensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Ex Parte RussellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re V.V.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Medical Discount Pharmacy, L.P., Lifechek Rosenberg GP, Inc., LifeChek, Inc. and Bruce v. Gingrich, Individually v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API