Higdon v. Davis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
1 — 4
This case presents an issue of first impression; whether one can acquire a prescriptive easement by adverse use for seven years under color of title pursuant to G.S. 1-38. The jury answered this issue in the affirmative and plaintiffs assign as error the trial court’s refusal to grant a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict on this issue. For the reasons herein stated, we find no error in the trial court’s refusal to grant plaintiffs’ motions.
A. Applicability of color of title to prescriptive easements.
In determining whether the doctrine of color of title…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Gibson v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Speight v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Woodring v. SwieterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Fulcher v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Stafford v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988