Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Morris

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1983No. 18230, 18234PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The petitioners in these two cases, which have been consolidated for disposition, have filed essentially identical original petitions for postconviction review in this Court pursuant to U.C.A., 1953, § 78-2-2 and Rule 65B Utah R.Civ.P. Both petitioners were in the process of seeking disposition on petitions for writs of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Utah when this Court issued its opinion in the case of State v. Wood, Utah, 648 P.2d 71 (1982). Consideration of those petitions was stayed by the federal district court “pending a decision…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Andrews v. DelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1993

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API