Muller v. Government Printing Office
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Concurring opinion filed by Chief Judge PROST.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Raymond Muller filed a grievance against his employer, the Government Printing Office, which was referred to an arbitrator pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The arbitrator dismissed the grievance as “not arbitrable,” on the ground that a four-month deadline for holding a hearing, required by the agreement, had passed. We conclude that the arbitrator erred; the contractual provision does not require dismissal of the grievance in the event of noncompliance with the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buffkin v. DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Bullock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Martin v. DhsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021