Legal Opinion

Treadwell v. M'Keel

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1801PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a suit on a bail-bond, in which judgment was obtained. The original suit was on a bond conditioned for the payment of money.

1Per curiam

We are of opinion that the bail to the arrest are only responsible for the principal sum and interest of the bond on which the defendant was arrested. It would be of dangerous consequence, and deter persons from becoming bail to the sheriff, to extend their responsibility further. It is settled in England, (Str. 922,) that special bail can never be made liable for more than they are bound in, let the plaintiff’s demand be ever so much more; and there is no reason that bail to the arrest should be liable for more than the plaintiff would be on becoming bail to the action. On bonds conditioned…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pitts v. TildenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API