Legal Opinion
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1998No. 97-4126PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
163 F.3d 341
160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2409
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 1099, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SOUTHWEST OHIO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-4126.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued June 15, 1998.
Decided Dec. 10, 1998.
Robert B. Newman (argued and briefed), Newman & Meeks, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Richard M. Goehler (argued and briefed), Jill M. Vollman (briefed), Ana Maria Merico-Stephens (briefed), Frost & Jacobs, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WELLFORD, MOORE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.
2Opinion of the Court · MooreMoore, J., joined by Clay, J.,
WELLFORD, J.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited57 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Seattle Mideast Awareness Campaign v. King CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015