Legal Opinion

State v. R. C. S. (In re R. C. S.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2018No. A165507PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

*1165*490Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days pursuant to ORS 426.130 and an order prohibiting her from purchasing or possessing firearms pursuant to ORS 426.130(1)(a)(D). Appellant argues that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise her of the right to subpoena witnesses under ORS 426.100(1)(d). See State v. Z. A. B. , 264 Or. App. 779, 780, 334 P.3d 480, adh'd to as modified on recons. , 266 Or. App. 708, 338 P.3d 802 (2014) (failure to inform a person of the right to subpoena witnesses constitutes plain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. S.F. (In re S.F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. W. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. J. O. B. (In re J. O. B.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. J. S. (In re J. S.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. R. A. R. (In re R. A. R.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. A. W. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. B. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API