State v. Alcazar
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
784 So.2d 1276 (2001)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Carl E. ALCAZAR, III.
No. 2000-KK-0536.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 15, 2001.
Keith R. Credo, Metairie, Counsel for Applicant.
Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Terry M. Boudreaux, Churita H. Hansell, Gretna, Counsel for Respondent.
KNOLL, Justice.[*]
This writ concerns whether compliance with LA.REV.STAT. §§ 32:661(C)(1) and 32:666(A), in particular the requirement that prior to testing the officer read the suspect under arrest for driving while intoxicated his right to refuse to take a chemical test, e.g., the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stoltz v. Department of Public Safety & CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Schexnaydre v. State, Department of Public Safety & CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Paul v. State, Department of Public SafetyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. DoucetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.