Legal Opinion

Fahy v. Lloyd

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 6, 1944No. Civil Action 2051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover damages because of an alleged breach of contract to marry. The following facts appear from the pleadings: The defendant in Massachusetts telephoned to the plaintiff, who was in Nassau, Bahama Islands, and asked the plaintiff to marry him. She over the phone accepted his proposal and agreed to marry him. Subsequently the defendant in Boston phoned to the plaintiff, who at that time was in Connecticut, and in the course of the conversation over the phone expressed his intention not to live up to his contractual promise.

There is now…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Wawrzin v. RosenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Earshlie I. Albert v. Margaret C. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Anderson v. Hearst Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Gaines v. PoindexterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1957
  4. O'CONNOR v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1947
  5. Tademy v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API