Legal Opinion

Ullman v. May

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1946No. 20291Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, P. J.

The plaintiff appellee was employed by the .defendant appellant as salesman. The contract was in writing. By para*578graph C of Provision II of the contract it is provided in part:

“C. In addition to payment due under provisions above, commissions will be paid employee as shown below on all sums of money billed to and collected from each individual client personally procured by the employee; said commission to be paid only during the time this agreement remains in full force ánd effect.”

(then follows the schedule of commissions)

Paragraph (a) of Provision I of the contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Addressograph Co. v. Office Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Braun v. Consolidated Electric Lamp Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Barton v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n of MissouriCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API