Legal Opinion

Godsey v. Poe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 7726SC641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The order of 19 July 1973 which the defendants allegedly violated was not appealed. Therefore, since the trial court was empowered to issue such an order, the parties were bound thereby even if it is later found to be based on a misinterpretation of the law. Dissatisfaction with an order should be expressed through appeal, not by open defiance. Massengill v. Lee, 228 N.C. 35, 44 S.E. 2d 356 (1947); Elder v. Barnes, 219 N.C. 411, 14 S.E. 2d 249 (1941); Annot., 12 A.L.R. 2d 1059 (1950). Accordingly, the question of whether the Open Meetings Law, G.S. 143-318.1, et seq. is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Elder v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Elder v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Massengill v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midgett v. Crystal Dawn Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In re Contempt Proceeding of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Midgett v. Crystal Dawn Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API