Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Town of Litchfield
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 31, 2005No. CIV.A. 3:02CV656JCHPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 59]
HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy Doyle (“Doyle”) brings this suit against the Town of Litchfield (“Litchfield”), asserting various theories of recovery. Each of the claims involves land that Doyle previously owned, situated approximately one-quarter mile from Litch-field’s landfill. The case has a lengthy history. Currently, Doyle alleges that he is entitled to relief under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (“RCRA”), Connecticut…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Soule Ex Rel. Stanescu v. Connecticut Association of Schools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Murtaugh v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Clean Harbors Servs., Inc. v. Ill. Int'lDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Stepniak v. United Materials, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Valbruna Slater Steel Corp. v. Joslyn Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.