Freeman v. City of Hackensack
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant City of Hackensack’s and defendant Frank Hansen’s motion for summary judgment. This matter was decided on the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, an African-American female, was an administrative assistant at Regent Care Center (“Regent”) in 1998. On September 18, 1998, plaintiffs colleague, Lisa Gapski, discovered that her wallet was missing when she attempted to make a purchase.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.