Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 20, 2012No. 11-7030PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge:
Stephanie Schweizer sued Océ North America, Inc., her former employer, under the False Claims Act’s qui tam and retaliation provisions, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b) & (h). The government moved to dismiss the qui tam claims after reaching a settlement agreement with Océ. 1 The district court granted the motion over Schweizer’s objection. It then granted Océ summary judgment on the remaining retaliation claim. We reverse and remand on all counts.
Océ sells copying and printing products. It had two supply contracts…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pencheng Si v. Laogai Research Foundation FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sylvia Singletary v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Mike Townsend v. Bayer HealthCareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Boone v. Mountainmade FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Zoltan Barati v. State of Florida, Motorola, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.