Legal Opinion

Downes v. Parshall

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from district court, Laramie •county. Petition of one Downes for an order re-•quiringone Parshall and another, assignee, to pay certain dividends from the assigned •estate, without the execution of a release. 'The petition was denied, and petitioner ¡brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtConaway, J.

Plaintiff in error filed his petition in the office of the clerk of the district court for Laramie county, July 17, 1890, praying an order of the court requiring and directing the defendant assignees to pay to plaintiff in error the dividend ■theretofore declared by them in the course •of the administration of the estate of the •said assignor, and such other dividends • as might, from time to time, be lawfully ■ declared and ordered, without the execution of the release of said assignor, as re- • quired by section 118, Rev. St. Wyo. 1887. On July 21,1890, a final order was made in • and by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. National Bank v. County of YanktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Benner v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. In re the Assignment of BirdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mc Cord-Brady Co. v. MillsWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Hasbrouck v. LaFebreWyoming Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API