Legal Opinion

Hart v. Kip

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Peter Hart against Isaac L. Kip to recover for services alleged to have been performed by plaintiff. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

An examination of this record leads us to the conclusion that it is more remarkable for its omissions than for its contents. This action was brought to recover for services alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff as janitor of premises No. 110 West Fortieth street, in the city of New York, upon the employment of the plaintiff, from the 1st day of May, 1879, until the 1st day of March, 1890. The defendant, by his answer, denied upon information and belief any contract of employment. The evidence showed that from the 1st of May, 1879, up to March, 1890, the plaintiff had occupied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanover National Bank v. StebbinsNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. SheahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Salisbury v. BennettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API