Orley Enterprises, Inc v. Tri-Pointe, Inc

(dissenting.) I respectfully dissent.

When contractual language is clear, its interpretation is a question of law for the court. When presented with a dispute, a court must determine what the parties’ agreement is and enforce it. Contractual language should be given its plain and ordinary meaning. G & A, Inc v Nahra, 204 Mich App 329, 330-331; 514 NW2d 255 (1994). Our task, *621then, is to determine if the language at issue is ambiguous.

The parties in this ease provided for default remedies in the purchase agreement as follows:

In the event of Default by the Purchaser in any material aspect of any…