Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 25, 2002No. A01A2024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Anthony Gray was convicted of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. On appeal, he claims the trial court improperly sentenced him and erred in dismissing his motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm.

1. A motion to suppress must be in writing and state facts showing that the challenged search and seizure were unlawful. Gray’s motion to suppress shows that shortly after midnight on February 13, 1999, he was riding as a passenger in his Nissan Maxima, which a woman was driving. Police officers observed a male prowling around some…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Cedric A. Dumas, Jr., and Terence D. DexterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. Flemister v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API