Legal Opinion

Hale v. Scanlon

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided December 28, 1953No. 9PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eagen, J.,

— Plaintiffs and defendants held legal title as tenants in common to a piece of real estate improved with three duplex dwelling houses. This action seeks partition of the land and accounting of the rents from defendant, Paul G. Scan-lon, an agreed-upon agent in the financial management of the properties.

Defendants filed an answer to the complaint to which plaintiffs have filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. The legal sufficiency of the answer is now before us for decision.

The answer admits the obligation of defendant, Paul Scanlon, to account and avers a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Roberts v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Mills v. BlakelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Real Estate Co. of Pgh. v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Thomas v. St. Joseph's Polish Nat. Catholic ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mather EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Kopp v. KoppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Mather EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API