Loverin v. Kuhne
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations and conduct respecting the defendants’ title to real estate, brought to and tried by the District Court of Waterbury, Peasley, ./., upon separate demurrers to the complaint filed by each defendant; the court sustained each demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiffs appealed.
Read the full summary
Action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations and conduct respecting the defendants’ title to real estate, brought to and tried by the District Court of Waterbury, Peasley, ./., upon separate demurrers to the complaint filed by each defendant; the court sustained each demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiffs appealed. The facts alleged in the complaint, aside from those of damage suffered, may be summarized as follows: In 1918 the defendants, husband and wife, were the owners in common of real estate in Woodbury, and the title thereto…
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, C. J.
The plaintiffs are for all practical purposes of this case one person. James H. Loverin’s presence as a party is as one substituted for his father as a beneficiary of the transaction in controversy. The controversy is really the father’s, and it will simplify statements somewhat if, in our discussion, we treat the father as the plaintiff and refer to him at times at least as such.
There are two defendants, husband and wife. Each filed a demurrer to the complaint. In so far as the husband’s demurrer is concerned, the averments of the complaint will be found to show fraud and deceit on his part,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Bristol v. BraidwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Beach v. OsborneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kramer v. PetisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Merritz v. CircelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Aksomitas v. AksomitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- United States v. Certain Property Located in Borough of ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Linch v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.