Legal Opinion

Solomon v. New Era Meat 2

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 27, 2007No. 3D06-2513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWells, J.

Affirmed. See Smith v. Orhama Inc., 907 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3 DCA 2005) (observing that it is the appellant’s burden to provide a record that will overcome the presumption of correctness as to the trial court’s findings and that “[wjhere there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed” (quoting Ahmed v. Travelers Indem. Co., 516 So.2d 40, 40 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lisanti v. City of Port RicheyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Ahmed v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Smith v. Orhama Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Warriner v. Doug Tower, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bechtel Corp. v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Bechtel Corp. v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. JOHN POMEROY v. GRIFFIN WINDOWS AND DOORS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API