Legal Opinion

Steadman v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for a recordari, supersedeas and injunction, heard before Watts Jl, at Spring Term, 1871, of Craven Superior Court. The facts necessary for a proper understanding of the case are stated in the opinion of tlie Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

This was an application to the Judge oí the Third District for a reeordari, supersedeas and injunction.

In his petition, the applicant states in substance:

1. That Jerusha Jones had brought an action against him in. a Justice’s Court, underthe Landlordand Tenant Act, 1868,-9, ch. 156, to recover possession of certain land held by him as her tenant; that upon the trial, the defendant, Steadman, offered to prove that the title to the property was in the assignee in bankruptcy oí one Samuel T. Jones, who was the original landlord oí the defendant; that the said Samuel T Jones had conveyed the land…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. S. Marsh & Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Hargrove v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Hargrove v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hargrove v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API