Legal Opinion

Doe v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 2004No. 03-1306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This appeal arises out of a complaint stice. on September 22, 2003, in the Pulaski County Circuit Court by Jane Doe and Jane Roe. Roe and Doe sought a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, including a temporary restraining order enjoining the Arkansas Department of Human Services’ Office of Long Term Care (“OLTC”) from implementing one of the OLTC’s rules. That rule, LTC-A-2003-14 (“the Rule”), provides that the OLTC will receive and review expunged criminal records from the Arkansas State Police in order to determine employment eligibility for OLTC employees. Jane…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Minnesota Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. Unity HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Villines v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Manila School District No. 15 v. WagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. HRR Arkansas, Inc. v. River City Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. ARKANSAS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICESSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API